CAMELOT Logo

Blog Archives

02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007 09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007 11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007 01/01/2008 - 02/01/2008 02/01/2008 - 03/01/2008 03/01/2008 - 04/01/2008 04/01/2008 - 05/01/2008 12/01/2008 - 01/01/2009 02/01/2009 - 03/01/2009

Links
Email Camelot
Theatre Effects
Stagecraft FAQ
Magic Magazine
Balloon HQ
History of Lighting
Sapsis Rigging and netHEADS
United States Institute for Theatre Technology, Inc.
Entertainment Services & Technology Association Blog Search Engine


This page is powered by Blogger.

Monday, May 30, 2005

I had a bad feeling about this...Dude!

Well, I lied. I told you all that I'd be first in line to see this mess but I wasn't. Actually, I didn't lie; I mispredicted. I waited until today to drag my sorry ass to Revenge of the Sith and I just got back.

Was it as bad as I said it would be? I'd be lying again if I said that it was a big epiphany for me and that George Lucas sure surprised me with a classy finish to his 28-year-long story. That's why I waited two weeks. I read all the reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, read all the spoilers on the other blogs and watched all the George Lucas interviews on TV. Then I watched all five of the other movies again. One featured an interview with George, who was asked if he could sum up the entire series in one word. "Unpredictable," said George. Unpredictable? Indigestible, maybe, but hardly unpredictable.

If you Google the term "special effects" you'll see several sites selling weird contact lenses and the rest selling fog machines. That's pretty much all that the internet associates with the term "special effects". Makes my blog pretty hard to find, doesn't it?

There were only two special effects in Revenge of the Sith: fog machines and weird contact lenses. Okay, Obi-wan rode around on a giant computer-generated Komodo dragon lizard (which meant he was really sitting on a stool) but it was the best part of the movie. All the rest was green-screen computer-generated fractal geometry. If you haven't seen it yet, wait for the DVD so that you can mute the volume and fast-forward through two-thirds of the film, otherwise you'll be forced to listen to Natalie, the Valley Girl, burble lines like "Annie, you're breaking my heart." I leaned over to my wife and whispered "Dude!" Then we both blew cherry Coke out of our noses. It was that kind of movie.

Acting? Horrible! Dialogue? Horrible! Plot? Duh. CG effects? If I had to choose another favorite besides the lizard, I'd select the "rust animators." They were the folks who followed the "mechanical artists" and "texture-mapped" the rust spots onto all the machines to make them look real. I liked that a lot. It saved me from thinking about things, like:

Why did Anakin Skywalker go over to "The Dark Side?" We never found out. He just said something like "No! No! Well, all right...I guess it sounds like a good deal." Supposedly it was because he loved Padme and didn't want her to die in childbirth, like he was excited about that! "I'm going to have a baby, Annie!" Annie: "Whatever." Nah, that wasn't the reason. Also: why does a race like the Jedi who can fly, predict the future and read people's minds from light-years away not suspect that Padme is carrying twins until she delivers the second one? Where was the Bettie Droid? She was probably not PG-13. What was supposed to be PG-13 was the "King Herod Slaughter of the Innocents" where Anakin kills all the kids. Now, I would have paid matinee prices to see that. Unfortunately, it was never shown.

It's passed, like a kidney stone, but now I read rumors of a TV series...two TV series! Dude! Without popcorn? It'll never work. We went home and watched the first Star Wars (the real one) to see the segues of the sets and costumes 28 years back in time. Those were well-done but I'll bet Peter Mayhew never wants to smell that Wookie suit again.

Thursday, May 26, 2005

The Reverse Moth Effect

I mentioned this in a previous posting. Professor John Flynn coined the term moth effect to describe the tendency of humans in commercial establishments, like bars and restaurants, to gravitate toward the lighted area or, at least, to sit facing the lighted area instead of with their backs toward it.

In the theatre world, we engineers take great pains as lighting designers to set up areas on the stage that are lit for each scene. We focus the FOH (front of house) lights, consisting of parcans and long-throw ellipsoidals from the catwalk, on an area designated by the director, then fill from the forward overhead electrics with fresnels and special short-throw ellipsoidals, then back-fill from the rear electric with more fresnels. When we're done with a light design, we walk through it with a piece of white paper to make sure it's evenly lit, then we bring actors out in costume and set the color gels to work with the costumes and the set.

Then we build the light plot, program the board for each scene or "look" and we're ready to run two days of tech rehearsals, that is, with lights, sound and special effects, followed by two days of full dress rehearsals with actors in costumes and makeup. Then it's showtime. Opening night. Full house, audience of paying customers, everyone's excited.

What happens? Act One, Scene Four. The stage manager calls to the booth on the headset "We're dark upstage right." The lighting tech looks at his light plot, runs the slide pot for channel 47 up and down and realizes that he's dead on 47, a long-throw ellipsoidal from the catwalk. He immediately dispatches a tech to the catwalk with a replacement bulb. These babies are 40 bucks apiece, by the way. Now, the tech can't swap out the bulb in the middle of the scene; that would look awful, so the lightboard operator and the tech hold off until channel 47 goes down then the tech has minutes or seconds to make the swap without throwing the ellipsoidal off its mark. In the meantime...

...all the actors, for some reason as yet unresolved in the theatre world, decide to skip their two months of blocking rehearsal and move over to upstage right. Why? I dunno. I act sometimes when I'm not tech directing. I guess it's a safe place but it's guaranteed: blow a lightbulb anywhere, there go the actors. We call it the reverse moth effect. We don't know why it works, we just know that a blown lightbulb means a blown show.

Here's the trick. Hey, directors! Get a clue! When you're blocking your show, tell your actors that lights are going to go dark. They just are. They're silly wire filaments in glass bottles and they burn out every so many hours. That's why they're called lightbulbs... duh! What are the odds, when we throw 48 high-intensity lamps onto your set that one of them is going to burn out in the middle of a scene? 100%! Guaranteed we're going dark in some area, every show! So: Tell your actors that they must improvise their blocking and stay the hell out of the dark spot until the techs swap out the bulb. It's not rocket science, it's just Theatre 101. Teach it to your cast. We can't change the laws of physics. You can produce smarter actors.

Friday, May 20, 2005

Comments? Please do!

There has been an ongoing debate among the magic blogs the last few weeks regarding the value of having comments enabled on blogsites, ever since Steve Pellegrino turned off the comments on Magicrants. He was taken to task by John LeBlanc of Escamoteurettes who wrote
"...a blog that doesn't afford visitors the ability to interact with the author is a one-way street and I consider (it) a traditional web site."
Then Andy at Magic Circle Jerk wrote
"Completely unnecessary. It's a blog. Short for "web log." You're logging your thoughts and activities. Star Trek starts out with Kirk saying, "Captain's Log..." it doesn't end with Spock adding, "2 kewl!!!!"
Andy always cracks me up.

I have comments turned on because I'm hoping to hear your opinions and experiences regarding the topics I write about. It's no secret that I'm writing a book with the working title "Special Effects for Limited Budgets" and that this blog is a great place to test chapter ideas and topics on you, my potential readers (and, I hope, buyers.)

Why do I think your comments will be worthwhile? I check my stats each day and I see some of you coming from NASA, M.I.T., Harvard and lots of very impressive domains. Now, I'm not fooling myself: I know you're all searching for the latest news on the Aliun Levitation (especially you NASA guys who are looking to cheap out on rockets) but on the rare chance that you are theatre majors or engineers, I'd really value your input! Actually, I value everyone's input... well, okay, not everyone's:

1. If your name is Bambi and you think it's important to tell us about your website where you and your roomies show off your panties, you'd better all be theatre majors or at least, not charge for the pantyshots.

2. If you've got a rad blog on Xanga.com and you want to leave me some eprops, those aren't the kind of props I'm interested in. Go away.

3. Viagra and Cialis are not special effects. Silicone breast implants are special effects.

There was a cable TV station, back in the early days of cable when local stations were scrambling for content, which had a camera focused on a bowl of goldfish for 24 hours a day. Live goldfish. That was it, something to test the channel with until they came up with some shows. One day, a station janitor was cleaning the studio and moved the bowl out of the camera frame. The phone lines lit up with indignant viewers demanding the goldfish back!

I figure that there must be a huge demographic out there who'll watch anything (otherwise, why does Ben Stiller make movies?) I also notice that there are thousands of new blogs appearing each day with content like: "toosday i fed my cat some tunafish and u wudn't belive what he puked on my bed!!!" followed by 20 comments from concerned readers. I assume that there were no Ben Stiller movies playing that week. I assume they did not work for NASA or attend Harvard or M.I.T. Those are just assumptions though, right? Comments?

Wednesday, May 18, 2005

Why motion-picture special effects are for sissies.

There's an old joke, a really old joke, that goes like this:

Cecil B. DeMille is shooting a phenomenal battle scene: 10,000 extras costumed as Roman soldiers and barbarians, 5,000 horses, chariots, catapults and even some elephants. At the end, the mountain erupts in a massive volcano and rivers of flaming lava cover 80 acres. Everyone who hasn't been slaughtered perishes in a fiery death. The scene has cost millions of dollars to build and it can only be done once so DeMille has three camera crews covering it from different angles. "Action!" he shouts and all hell breaks loose for 20 minutes.

When the smoke clears, DeMille yells to the first camera: "Did you get all that?" "Aw, geez," says the guy. "I had the damned lens cap on!" "That's okay," says DeMille, then hollers to the second crew. "Sorry, C.B.," yells the photog. "We lost power when the volcano blew and the camera died." "No problem," shouts DeMille, then hollers up to the third crew through his megaphone: "Hey, Louie. You okay?" Louie yells back: "Ready when you are, C.B.!"

Hahahaha! Ha. Pretty funny, right? The reason I brought this up is that I just finished reading a wonderful coffee-table book: No Strings Attached: The Inside Story of Jim Henson's "Creature Shop" by Matt Bacon in which the author describes the difficulties of shooting a three-year television series ("Dinosaurs") featuring animatronic characters versus building a one-time special-effect creature for a movie (like the brontocrane in The Flintstones.) The problem is that the effects are complex, intricate and fragile so they're fine for a one-shot appearance but need to be continually rebuilt during a long-running show.

In live theater, we're faced with runs of anywhere from a few weeks to many years and, barring some touch-up maintenance, lubrication and tightening of screws, our effects have got to last as well as be repeatable time after time, sometimes in multiple shows per day. We must always build for longevity. The motion-picture special-effects shop can say "The arm will fall off this thing after a few swings but who cares?" whereas we have to say: "I dare you to break this thing!" and build it to remain trouble-free despite the dreaded Actor Factor (an actor will find a dozen ways to screw up a foolproof gag, just like they will gravitate to the dark spot on an otherwise well-lighted stage in the amazing Reverse Moth Effect.)

The traveling show is one of our greatest accomplishments. I've loaded enough Children's Theatre Company productions in and out to appreciate their construction: never use wood when steel angle-iron is available, never use a 1/4" bolt when you can use a 1" bolt, weld everything. Who cares that it requires a fork lift to move the stuff? It won't break!

Think about this the next time you go to the movies: Where is that thing now? It's long gone, merely a memory on a strip of film. Theatre effects, on the other hand, simply go back into storage to await cannibalization of their parts for another show. "But Craig," you say, "you just finished writing about building stuff out of cardboard! Now you're talking about welded steel?" Yes, but I'm also talking about moving parts. Carboard props, gessoed and painted, last almost forever and are easy to rebuild if need be. But animatronics and machinery in live theater need to rival that stuff that NASA sent to Mars.

Thursday, May 12, 2005

Corrugated cardboard: a magical medium. (Part Three)

Cardboard props are nothing new. Cardboard boxes come ready-made in all sizes and can be taped together and painted as they are to create squared or rectangular looking things. No imagination needed there: boxes are boxes whether they're buildings, appliances or furniture. But what about spherical or oblate objects? How about animals, monsters and teapots? Well, computer graphics special effects folks build a wire frame model and then join the lines to create a polyhedral solid. That solid is then rendered by sophisticated algorithms to produce a ray-traced, Gouraud-shaded three-dimensional looking object on the screen which is, basically, why Pixar looks different than classical Disney and forms the fundamentals of CGI special effects on-screen in big-budget films. But that doesn't work in real life with actual flat panels, like corrugated cardboard, does it? Yes, it does and it's a technique well worth learning, young special-effects Jedi.

We begin with the art of origami, Japanese paper-folding, which allows the construction of polyhedral shapes from flat pieces of paper (or cardboard) with a minimum of cutting or piecing-together of parts. It gets pretty nuts: you can make a swan or a bunny, or you can make a truncated hexadecahedron or a stellated icosahedron. I recommend a fine book: 3-D Geometric Origami, Modular Polyhedra, by Rona Gurkewitz, Associate Professor of Mathematics and Computer Science at Western Connecticut State University and Bennett Arnstein, a mechanical hardware engineer in the aerospace industry. It's only $6.95 from Dover Publications and you need it, so buy it.

Once you have mastered the scam of making polyhedral solids from refrigerator shipping cartons with a minimum of cutting, the next step is pure Camelot. You "sculpture" the shapes by rounding the edges and blending the curves so that the polyhedron ceases to have sharp joints and becomes smooth and lifelike. This is a blog; I go into greater depth in my upcoming book, but the basic trick is:

You break the corrugations. Everyone who's ever smashed boxes for the trash knows that corrugated cardboard can be folded or rolled easily parallel to the corrugations. Duh. When you try to fold it against the corrugations, however, that doesn't work for sour owl shit and is why corrugated cardboard was invented in the first place. It folds funny, goes all weird and is totally unmanageable. So: you need to roll it. You can do it by hand on a large sculpture if you don't plan on needing to use your fingers for the next week or you can use a simple tool: a wooden dowel or a piece of pipe which will give you a smooth and even breaking perpendicular to the corrugations.

That's two dimensions. You can roll diagonally in infinite dimensions! Here's the beauty: the corrugated cardboard remembers each of those dimensions and becomes totally plastic. Now, by cutting slits, v-shapes and vesical slits (curved v-shapes) you can form smooth spherical, oblate or rounded shapes and then seal the seams with tape. What kind of tape? Hey, duct tape always works but packing tape is okay in a pinch and gives a flatter profile. As for the tape seams, Gesso or thick paint does the trick and the finished sculpture easily passes the "ten-foot rule." Then you paint it and nobody, even on close examination, will recognize that it once contained a Maytag.

This could be a university art or theatre course. It'll definitely be a book chapter with illustrations.

Tuesday, May 10, 2005

Cultural Pollution (Part Two)

In northern central Greece, halfway between Athens and Thessalonika (about three hours drive from either), is the city of Volos on the Pagasitikos Gulf. Mythology places this as the point from which Jason and his Argonauts sailed in their trireme in search of The Golden Fleece. It's a good-sized city, about a quarter-million population, an industrial seaport and tourist center but not very well-known. Behind Volos rises Mount Pelion, one mile high, dotted with small villages, apple and pear orchards and olive groves. Pelion is the mythical home of the centaurs: half-man, half horse. It's a pretty, quiet place.

Halfway up the mountain, a 17 kilometer drive, is the village of Drakeia, an old Greek word meaning "palm of the hand" because the village sits in a valley like, well, like it was sitting in the palm of a giant's hand. The 800 residents of Drakeia are mostly apple farmers and goatherds. That's pretty much it. They work hard in their orchards all day and drink tsipouro (an anise-flavored booze similar to ouzo but homemade) in the kafeneio at night. They go to church on Sundays and some of them may be centaurs but they keep pretty much to themselves.

One winter evening in 1992, a number of the residents were sitting around in the kafeneio discussing how quiet things were. There isn't much to do in the orchards during the winter, which is why tsipouro was invented, but the owner of the kafeneio was lamenting the lack of tourism over the last few years. Not that Drakeia is a tourist stop; "quaintly provincial and unsullied" would be more like it. And good tsipouro. Everyone was listening quietly including the village doctor, an Englishwoman with Greek nationality, and her boyfriend, an American expatriate engineer who had lived in Greece for six years and learned the language.

"Didn't the village have a Carnival celebration, like Patras does, many years ago?" asked the doctor. (Carnival in Rio and Mardi Gras in New Orleans take place the week before Lent and consist of parades with costumes, floats, music, royalty and lots of booze.) "That would bring people in."

"That was a long time ago" said a village elder. "There was one man in the village who was a carpenter. He built a wonderful float: a big airplane of wood. It took him a year. He's dead now and no one else knows how to build things like that. And it would be very expensive. This is a poor village." Greek optimism.

"We could do groups," said one of the women. "Like, well, fruit. This is a fruit-growing village. The children could be fruit. We could make costumes."

"Too expensive. Too much work. Not enough people to sew."

The American engineer sat quietly at a table in the corner, drinking tsipouro and idly sketching on a napkin. (In my study of technological innovation, it's amazing the prominent roles played by alcohol and napkins in the creative process.) "Let's ask him," said the doctor. "He's a theatre engineer." So they did.

"Well," said the American, "wonderful three-dimensional shapes can be built using cardboard from appliance boxes and duct tape." He showed them the napkin sketches. "An apple is just a bunch of segments, called vesica, taped together to form a sphere. You can make any sort of fruit or any shape out of cardboard sheets by curving them both with and against the corrugations, then putting people inside."

"American technology!" said the woman.

"Actually it was Euclid and Pythagoras, a couple of Greek guys," said the American.

So the men started bringing cardboard boxes up the mountain each day in their pickup trucks: refrigerator boxes, oven boxes, television boxes. And rolls and rolls of packing tape. The women cut and bent and taped. The children painted. The American drank tsipouro and sketched designs. They built apples, pears, bananas and bunches of grapes. They built a team of cooking utensils: teapots, skillets, clocks, refrigerators and ovens. They built a team of beverage containers: beer bottles, tsipouro glasses, soda cans and wine barrels. Then the American built a huge motorized dragon and the doctor rode her horse as Saint George and slayed it. It was a wonderful parade. There was a queen and four princesses. Thousands of people came up the mountain to see it and they drank and danced and spent lots of money. It made the national television. The parade became an annual tradition again.

The villagers became masters at the art of three-dimensional cardboard modeling. Farmers and goatherds relearned the concepts of solid and spherical geometry. Five years later, watching the parade over a glass of tsipouro, the American laughed and said: "Two generations from now, some cultural anthropologist is going to discover this and wonder what the hell happened here." Then he went back to America.

I miss tsipouro. Ouzo isn't quite the same.

Tomorrow I'll post Part 3: Corrugated cardboard, the miracle set construction material!

Monday, May 09, 2005

Julie Taymor, Margaret Mead and Schroedinger's Cat

In her speech before the National Press Club on NPR in November, 2000, producer/director Julie Taymor (The Lion King stage version, Titus, Frida) told about her experiences in Bali at the age of 21 where she discovered a highly-developed shadow puppet theatre culture. The flat, jointed, shadow puppets were manipulated behind a translucent scrim, illuminated from behind by Coleman lanterns, and while the action appeared only in silhouette, she was amazed that the puppets themselves were brightly painted in intricate detail. (The Greek "Karaghiozi" puppets are decorated in the same way and came from the East, possibly the same source.) The audience never sees the colors, merely shadows, but Taymor pointed out that the decorations were artistically important to the performers themselves, a concept she carried forward into her own career and designs.

I waited for her to make an anthropological error at that point, but, to my delight and her credit, Taymor did not. She explained that painting was not part of the Balinese culture until it was brought to Bali by the Dutch, but that the Balinese used the foreign medium to express their own culture. (That makes sense: my hammer was invented by Oogaluk Australopithecus and made by Stanley Tools but the stuff I build with it is all mine.) Recognizing the foreign influence on a culture under study was a good catch, making 21-year-old Julie Taymor a lot sharper in the cultural anthropology department than, let's say, 24-year-old cultural anthropologist Margaret Mead.

In 1925, Mead left for a nine-month stay in Samoa, an island in the southwest central Pacific Ocean, to study adolescence and biological and cultural influences on behavior. Mead lived with the villagers during the day and at night, observing behavior and customs that otherwise would have remained unknowable to a person from the United States. She discovered that monogamy (marriage to one person) and jealousy were not valued or understood by the Samoans, and that divorce occurred simply by the husband or wife "going home." However, her most important work in Samoa was on courtship patterns in adolescents. Her book Coming of Age in Samoa, published in 1928 and based on her studies of adolescent behavior in a Polynesian society, became a best-seller and brought its author to the forefront of American anthropology where she would remain for half a century.

Unfortunately, as it turned out, Mead was "snookered real good" by the crafty Samoans who felt that telling her what she wanted to hear was the way to please this foreign visitor. Basically, their stories of a liberal sex life among teens was total baloney and served to titillate millions around the world while eventually bringing discredit to Mead. Margaret Mead had fallen afoul of the classic "Schroedinger's Cat" in which the act of observing a phenomenon alters the phenomenon and even the Samoans, reading the popular Coming of Age in Samoa, apparently felt that their neighbors were having way too much fun and that they should get hip themselves. Samoan culture changed drastically.

Tomorrow I will continue with the second part of this story: "How I screwed up the culture of a simple village and hosed off future anthropologists. You can too!"

The Lion King - Limited View

I just got back from the stage version of The Lion King, a travelling three-hour special effects overload extravaganza. Yes, Julie Taymor's puppet creations were marvelous and the actors who controlled them were brilliant. As for the rest, I need to see it again from further back in the theatre to appreciate it all. I mean, it featured every stage special effect known to man... all going on simultaneously! You want volcano vents spewing steam? Got it. Flying by Foy? Yup, Dave Hearn designed that. Intelligent lights? Check. How about some strobes to give the epileptics in the audience fits? Sure, those too.

The story? As you recall from the cartoon, it's Hamlet "where a ghost and a prince meet and everyone ends in mincemeat" except it's a family show so Ophelia doesn't go mad, Hamlet doesn't die and they get married in the end. Well, lions don't actually marry; they just get together and make more lions. They are very efficient.

I got the tickets through Ticketmaster the hour they went on sale. I selected the best seats in the house: ground floor, ten rows back, on the aisle so we could see the animal parade and Taymor's work close at hand. I hit the "Submit" button under pressure ("You have one minute remaining... You have 30 seconds remaining...") and back came the confimation: LIMITED VIEW, NO REFUNDS OR EXCHANGES. I hate Ticketmaster.

So there we were, at the theatre, all worried about whether we were going to be sitting behind a post or what. I had hoped, at best, that the LIMITED VIEW might be some of the special effects machinery, perhaps, which would not have bothered me at all; I would have been more interested in that than in Elton John's musical score. Instead, the LIMITED VIEW turned out to be "Seating for oversized audience member." Yup, you've got it: there was a special chair in front of my seat for a guy who brought his own gravitational system with him. Here's the view from my seat at The Lion King.

Okay, the ticket was 20 bucks cheaper than those of the folks sitting two seats over, but hey, Ticketmaster: How about providing that information BEFORE the order is accepted, or maybe give Jumbo a shorter chair or a part in the show?

Sunday, May 08, 2005

Hot new Aliun Levitation rumor...

...which I just made up! How's this?

There is no Aliun Levitation. It's just trick photography (notice the bogus camera angles?) to lure people into buying Ellusionist's Shapeshifter DVD. Without the teaser, who would blow $24.95 to learn a card change? Not you, that's for sure. Actually, ALIUN is a cleverly misspelled acronym for "Another Levitation Is UNnecessary."

Pretty good rumor, huh? Pass it on!

Thursday, May 05, 2005

The Aliun Levitation...

...isn't here! I'm getting dozens of search engine hits each week from people searching for the Aliun Levitation. All I know is what you know: It's slated to be released in Spring 2005 (uh, that's like... now.) Until then, the only evidence of its existence is as a demo preview on the Shapeshifter video. Looking at the number of inquiries that just I am receiving, that Shapeshifter must be one hot seller! Ellusionist says:

Currently included on the Shapeshifter DVD is an exclusive, never-before-seen first glimpse of ALIUN. Thousands of emails have been received by Team Ellusionist over the past year from users around the globe wanting to know the latest on the end-all underground levitation project. The first glimpse of ALIUN, the only information released anywhere, is on SHAPESHIFTER.

I've heard lots of rumors. I'll have to remind myself to stop starting them.

Camelot Theatrical Special Effects at Blogged