CAMELOT Logo

Blog Archives

02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007 09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007 11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007 01/01/2008 - 02/01/2008 02/01/2008 - 03/01/2008 03/01/2008 - 04/01/2008 04/01/2008 - 05/01/2008 12/01/2008 - 01/01/2009 02/01/2009 - 03/01/2009

Links
Email Camelot
Theatre Effects
Stagecraft FAQ
Magic Magazine
Balloon HQ
History of Lighting
Sapsis Rigging and netHEADS
United States Institute for Theatre Technology, Inc.
Entertainment Services & Technology Association Blog Search Engine


This page is powered by Blogger.

Sunday, January 09, 2005

VOE: Violation of Expectation

My brother, the behavioral psychologist in our family (and an amateur magician), explained something to me today that I never considered. He's reading "Wild Minds: What Animals Really Think" by Marc D. Hauser and came upon the concept of VOE, "Violation of Expectation," as a long-researched concept by behavioral psychologists that has served as a measure of not only sentience in animals but childhood development in humans.

It has been found in many studies (do a Google search) that infants as young as four months begin to react when they sense the VOE phenomenon. My brother used the "French Drop" as an example but psychologists have used several different tests. Try this "Dishabituation Event" on your child.

Children develop this "concept of impossibility" at such an early age that psychologists now argue whether it is "learned" or "genetic." Hauser, in his book, says that dogs and primates (monkeys, apes, you) are suckers for "magic tricks" but cats are not (which might have been a good thing for Roy Horn to have known.) Monty Python had great fun with "Confuse-A-Cat," "Puzzle-A-Puma" and "Bewilderbeast" but Hauser points out that cats simply cannot be confused because they have no concept of "expectation" as much as we, their masters, would like to anthropomorphize them.

"Violation of Expectation" (VOE) therefore becomes the principle upon which "Magic" is based, and explains why you can be a big success at childrens' birthday parties as well as on-stage in Las Vegas. We humans, genetically, know at a very early age (four months) when something "just doesn't seem right." A magic trick, therefore, is anything that violates your expectation. Your eye follows the French Drop worker's moving hand and, when it opens empty, gives you that primitive "What the...?" reaction. The dog raises its ears, the monkey furrows its brow and the kittycat could care less... it doesn't even sense that something happened.

So the next time a spec asks you how you did that, just tell him: "I simply violated your expectation. You did it to yourself!"

Unless he's a cat.

We theatrical special effects mavens need to conceptualize this in reverse: Whatever "violates the expectation" on stage is a bad effect. If the ceiling rings and the actor answers the phone, that's no good. If the gun goes "pop" instead of "BLAM!" that's no good. VOE is good for magicians, bad for theatre.

Unless you're performing "Cats." (I crack myself up!)



Camelot Theatrical Special Effects at Blogged