Blog Archives
02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004
03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004
04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004
05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004
06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004
07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004
09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004
10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004
11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004
12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005
01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005
02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005
03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005
04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005
05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005
06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005
08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005
09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005
10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005
11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005
01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006
02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006
05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006
06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006
08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006
09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006
12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007
08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007
09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007
10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007
11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007
01/01/2008 - 02/01/2008
02/01/2008 - 03/01/2008
03/01/2008 - 04/01/2008
04/01/2008 - 05/01/2008
12/01/2008 - 01/01/2009
02/01/2009 - 03/01/2009
Links
|
My brother, the behavioral psychologist in our family (and an amateur magician), explained something to me today that I never considered. He's reading "Wild Minds: What Animals Really Think" by Marc D. Hauser and came upon the concept of VOE, "Violation of Expectation," as a long-researched concept by behavioral psychologists that has served as a measure of not only sentience in animals but childhood development in humans.
It has been found in many studies (do a Google search) that infants as young as four months begin to react when they sense the VOE phenomenon. My brother used the "French Drop" as an example but psychologists have used several different tests. Try this "Dishabituation Event" on your child. Children develop this "concept of impossibility" at such an early age that psychologists now argue whether it is "learned" or "genetic." Hauser, in his book, says that dogs and primates (monkeys, apes, you) are suckers for "magic tricks" but cats are not (which might have been a good thing for Roy Horn to have known.) Monty Python had great fun with "Confuse-A-Cat," "Puzzle-A-Puma" and "Bewilderbeast" but Hauser points out that cats simply cannot be confused because they have no concept of "expectation" as much as we, their masters, would like to anthropomorphize them. "Violation of Expectation" (VOE) therefore becomes the principle upon which "Magic" is based, and explains why you can be a big success at childrens' birthday parties as well as on-stage in Las Vegas. We humans, genetically, know at a very early age (four months) when something "just doesn't seem right." A magic trick, therefore, is anything that violates your expectation. Your eye follows the French Drop worker's moving hand and, when it opens empty, gives you that primitive "What the...?" reaction. The dog raises its ears, the monkey furrows its brow and the kittycat could care less... it doesn't even sense that something happened. So the next time a spec asks you how you did that, just tell him: "I simply violated your expectation. You did it to yourself!" Unless he's a cat. We theatrical special effects mavens need to conceptualize this in reverse: Whatever "violates the expectation" on stage is a bad effect. If the ceiling rings and the actor answers the phone, that's no good. If the gun goes "pop" instead of "BLAM!" that's no good. VOE is good for magicians, bad for theatre. Unless you're performing "Cats." (I crack myself up!)
|