CAMELOT Logo

Blog Archives

02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007 09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007 11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007 01/01/2008 - 02/01/2008 02/01/2008 - 03/01/2008 03/01/2008 - 04/01/2008 04/01/2008 - 05/01/2008 12/01/2008 - 01/01/2009 02/01/2009 - 03/01/2009

Links
Email Camelot
Theatre Effects
Stagecraft FAQ
Magic Magazine
Balloon HQ
History of Lighting
Sapsis Rigging and netHEADS
United States Institute for Theatre Technology, Inc.
Entertainment Services & Technology Association Blog Search Engine


This page is powered by Blogger.

Wednesday, June 21, 2006

Insultingly Stupid Movie Physics

Now, I'm not saying that movies should be educational nor even that they should represent the world as it really is. That would be silly. When Elliott rides his bicycle through the sky across the face of the moon with E.T. in the basket, that's a great logo for Amblin Entertainment. It's not a documentary. It is assumed that a moviegoer, once he has his bucket of popcorn and a paper cup of something sticky to spill so that I can hear my feet go "click-click" when I come to the theatre next week, will park his brain under the seat with the chewing gum and just watch the screen. Thinking has always been discouraged at the movies. That's their advantage: you are excused from thinking for a couple of hours. To me, that and the popcorn are worth ten bucks.

The problem arises later when people whose primary source of education has been movies (and that's just about everybody, in America at least) is stopped on the street and asked questions about the world and how things work. They respond incorrectly. Some of these people are policymakers and educators. Why does a Schwartzenneger movie carry more weight than a Schwartzenegger technology initiative? Because the first has been observed, the second only imagined.

Should theatre be scientifically correct? Hell, no, but at the very least, the audience should be able to tell the difference between special effects and reality after the show is over. Here's a brilliant website that's not only fun to read but satisfying to fans of NUMB3RS as well.



Camelot Theatrical Special Effects at Blogged